Crime+Scene+Scriped

media type="custom" key="4738263".My name is Detective Wozniak. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene in a two storie two bedroom and one bath beach house.The victims are Kendra Goode and Alfredo fetticcune.Kendra Goode is a artist she is a friend of felixs, but she doesnt like him so well. She has peirced ears. Alfredo Fetticcune is a computer programer he also plays guitar. he has a cut on his left hand. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode and Alfredo Fetticcune. Kendra wanted to kill felix beacuse his parents passed away from a sky dive crash and felix got a lot of money. kendra is in his will but she couldnt kill him by herself so she asked Alfredo to help her and she would split the money with him. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was Kendras finger prints on felixs cup. The evidence was found near felixs body lying dead on the floor.The test performed was Fingerprint. The results of the test were, we took the two cups and but them in a bag with monster glue we left it in over night then it showed all of the finger prints were on the cup. This connects the suspect to the crime because we had finger prints of each suspect, and on felixs cup were kendra and felix and on Alfredos cup only his finger prints were on his cup. The next piece of evidence collected was the ice cube tray test. It was found on the floor near nothing. The test performed was powder test. (Ph test) The results of the test were the ice cube tray had powder on the rim and in the water. Four of the ice cubes were missing and the tray was blue. This connects the suspect to the crime because the powder on the ice cube tray was thhe same powder on Kendras shoe and the powder was chemical to make someone die.Felix had four of those ice cubes to make him fall to the ground and die. Another piece of evidence collected was a note to frame Vera. It was found near the bowl of dryed paint and the paint brush. The test performed was handwrighting. The results of the test were we had a sample of each of the suspects handwriting and the writing on the drawing pad matched kendra. This connects the suspect to the crime because it had kendras handwriting but it said at the end of the note love vera sooo kendra was framing vera then she would be a suspect. The last piece of evidence collected was felixs cup had kendras finger prints on his cup. It was found on the front porch were he poured his pepsi in his cup. The test performed was Fingerprint (You already presented this evidence). The results of the test were that when kendra went upstais but there is now upstaires that she put poison in the ice cubes and gave felix the drink with ice cubes i it. This connects the suspect to the crime because alfredos cup was regular an felixs cup was 10 base so she didnt. According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. (Describe the series of events from the very beginning to the end). Therefore, (name of the guilty suspect) committed the crime of (what was the crime supported by your evidence) for (motive).

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || **__The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.__**  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || **__Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.__**  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__ The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. __** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__ Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  __** || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  __** || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__ Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  __** || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__ Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  __** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  || **__ Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  __** || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 47/57  ||